

Banking representatives have said for years the UIGEA rules would encumber the system and present too strong a challenge to enforce. Still, anti-gambling leaders said the banks were able to achieving the ban.
“We’ve become the de facto cops at the beat," said the director for public policy on the Massachusetts Bankers Association, Jon Skarin, to the Boston Herald. "Why are we the law enforcement officials for this sort of activity?”
Still, Skarin acknowledged the banks had installed place systems to dam gambling transactions, using bank card codes. Gaming sites have said for years they are able to employ such coding to effectively block fraud, identity theft, and underage participation, the very regulation that UIGEA proponents deny exists.
Further, online casinos can be willing and eager partners within the use of advanced technologies to control their industry and attain the approval of watchful US lawmakers, whereas the banking industry participates only on the equivalent of gunpoint.
"It can't be argued that it's feasible to inspect transactions which can be deliberately obfuscated by the operator and effectively screen online gambling payments, but not admit that cooperative online casinos can also be efficiently regulated to forestall adolescent play and compulsive gambling," said OCA gaming analyst Sherman Bradley.
Published on June 2, 2010 by TomWeston

Read More... [Source: UIGEA News]
No comments:
Post a Comment