Last month I managed to make the overall three tables of the Sunday Million onPokerStars before bowing out in 26th. Yesterday poker pro and online star Bryan “bparis” Paris shared his thoughts concerning a few key hands I played along the way, and today we conclude the discussion with Paris taking a look at three more important hands from late in my run.
Hand 3: Overplaying Ace-Nine from the Button
Blinds had just gone as much as 25,000/50,000 with an ante of 5,000, and after winning a few hands against smaller stacks I USED TO BE sitting with a good stack of virtually 55 big blinds after I opted to lift to 105,000 with 
from the button.
The small blind folded and the large blind called, and the flop came 
to provide me middle pair. After being checked to, I bet 125,000. My opponent called, then checked again after the 
turn. This time I bet 260,000, and again was called.
We both checked the 
river, with my opponent shipping the pot after turning over 
.
Paris: Not much to mention preflop, as our raise at the button here's completely standard. At the flop, I'M fine with c-betting the most productive nine here, likely opting to test back 
and 
as they suffer less from allowing a free turn and so they can’t get called by as many worse nines. 
can still get quite a lot of action from worse nines, all sevens, and the range of heterosexual draws he may have in this board.
The turn, however, is a special story. The jack is an improved card for his range than it's for our hand, as a lot of his hands we were sooner than at the flop have now improved to either a couple better than ours, two pair, or a straight. Our hand still has some amount of showdown value, enough to the purpose where I don’t actually need to show it right into a bluff, which I THINK makes the turn a check.
Once we've arrived on the river on this fashion, I TRULY prefer going the entire way with turning our hand right into a bluff and betting a 3rd time to fold out a few of his pair+straight draw hands, of which he has many (
, 
, , etc.). This can be a spot where he’s not folding turn fairly often at all, but must fold lots of those hands at the river to a 3rd barrel which puts tremendous pressure on him, especially this deep within the tournament.
I should clarify that I don’t believe we should always plan on three-barrel bluffing with this hand; I FEEL my three-barrel bluff range on this spot would mostly be created from backdoor spade draws that missed with possibly some combos jumbled together. However, I do think that after we’ve made the error of turning the hand right into a bluff at the turn, we've a potentially profitable third-barrel bluff spot at the river.
Lessons: Avoid inadvertently bluffing with hands that experience enough showdown value to test. Identify the road where your opponent is folding probably the most should you do wish to bluff. If you happen to make a mistake and bluff when you’re not speculated to on an earlier street, sometimes it’s better to decide to that plan of action than to chop it off halfway through and suffer during the worst of both worlds.
Hand 4: Calling a Three-Bet with Pocket Sevens
With blinds remaining the similar and starting up the hand with 42 BBs, I raised to 105,000 from under the gun with 
. I USED TO BE three-bet to 250,000 by a player in later position with 24 BBs, which on the time seemed cheap enough for me to name even if I felt he was strong.
The 
flop was actually a fair one for me. However, I opted to check-fold to my opponent’s bet of 305,000.
Paris: That is something of a typical call when the stacks are deeper, but this late within the tournament with stacks this short, we simply can’t afford to look a flop out of position against a robust range. The truth that we wound up check-folding on probably the greatest boards for our hand illustrates this fact.
There could also be an increasingly large ICM effect deep in tournaments, which means chips we risk out of our stack are worth greater than the chips we will win, unlike in a cash game or early within the tournament where the worth of every is roughly equal (or exactly equal within the cash game).
If we somehow have a powerful read that our opponent is three-betting too wide on this spot (very, only a few people do, but they're out there), then we should always just jam preflop to maximise our fold equity and be ahead some percentage of the time after we are called by or . Realistically, I'D SIMPLY fold on this spot nearly all of the time, as sevens within reason weak relative to the remainder of our UTG opening range.
I picked this hand partly as it illustrates something I’ve noticed, that is that a lot of players overvalue “set mining” in tournaments, especially in the event that they have a background in soft live cash games where hitting a suite frequently means stacking an opponent who dramatically overplays an overpair for heaps of huge blinds. The location could be very different in tournaments, because the stacks are much shorter, and online the players have a tendency to be a lot better so that you don’t get the automated double whilst you make your set.
I would advise anyone trying to break into tournaments in general, and particularly online tournaments, to desert your notions of what constitutes a profitable “set mine” except within the very early stages. Low pairs deep in tournaments are more likely to be profitable when jammed for a mixture of value and fold equity than to be played as a suite mine.
Lesson: When deep within the tournament, avoid spots where you're looking for a miracle flop in favor of constructing decisive moves with hands which can be likely already best. Set mining sucks.
Hand 5: Three-Barrel Bluffing with King-Queen Suited
Blinds increased to 40,000/80,000 with an ante of 8,000 and that i had chipped back as much as 42 BBs once I opened the action to 168,000 from the cutoff with 
. Everyone folded however the big blind who opted to call.
The flop of 
presented a ton of value for me as I had both the flush draw and overcards. My opponent checked, I opted to bet 200,000, and my opponent called. While the at the turn was of no value to me, after being checked to I MADE UP MY MIND to seem strong and bet again — this time for 300,000 — and all over again was called.
When the 
completed the board, my opponent checked a 3rd time. I ATTEMPTED to symbolize this was a fair card for me and bet 700,000. My opponent called, shipping a large pot with 
.
Paris: Preflop here's again completely standard, although I WOULD open to a rather bigger size because the player within the big blind is an aggressive regular who’s not a large fan of folding, and charging him more to peer a flop appears to be in our greatest interest even if our hand is that this strong. At the flop I believe the c-bet, as we've an excellent draw but in addition only have king-high, meaning we take pleasure in putting pressure on his 
, 
, and ace-high hands as we get to win the entire pot the days we make him fold those.
The turn is, once again, where the hand becomes interesting. Normally I FEEL this can be a spot where we must always be checking the turn a lot, as his range becomes stronger than ours at the turn for 2 reasons — we're going to be c-betting wider than he's going to be calling as we're the preflop aggressor, and he has far more hands than we do (since we probably don’t raise a lot of them, and usually check back flop with the few we do raise).
I could be checking this turn quite frequently with the intention of inducing bluffs from busted draws at the river, or possibly bluffing myself if he checked again, dependent on what the river is.
With all of that said, this specific hand does take pleasure in being three-barreled, as we have now merely king-high but a large number of equity, so if we wish to have a three-barrel range this could certainly be in there. However, I BELIEVE this deep in a tournament, if we wish to take the three-barrel route we must always size the turn sufficiently big to establish a river jam. A three-barrel is primarily targeting his and , so we have to size large enough to the purpose where we convince him to fold a few of his weaker hands by the river if we wish to make it profitable for ourselves.
The problem with the sizing we really utilized in the hand is that the majority of his hands may be capable of comfortably call on many rivers. If our goal isn’t to fold out some collection of hands, I FEEL we’re checking back turn and doubtless bluffing some rivers, as targeting only isn’t enough to warrant betting all three streets.
On the river, we hit an out of this world card for the three-barrel bluff plan, and that i think the sizing is ok given the best way we sized the turn. However, our turn sizing came back to bite us as he continued past the turn with a reasonably weak holding, one he could have been compelled to fold to a bigger bet. So far as this specific hand goes, our line would have worked on many rivers, but I THINK I MIGHT go together with either checking back the turn or sizing it big enough to establish a river jam if we wish to apply maximum pressure.
Lessons: Frequently when the ground or middle card pairs at the turn, that may be better for the massive blind’s range than for the preflop raiser’s range. When three-barreling, size your bets to position maximum pressure at the opponent’s stack, whether you’re bluffing or going for value.
* * * * *
Thanks to Bryan Paris for his help and insight. You will get coaching from him at bryanjamesparis.com and follow him on Twitter at @bparispoker.
You too can follow this author on Twitter at @JaxonPoker.
Want to stick atop the entire latest within the poker world? If so, make sure you get PokerNews updates for your social media outlets. Follow us on Twitter and find us on both Facebook and Google+!
PokerNews.com is the world's leading poker website. Among other things, visitors will discover a daily dose of articles with the most recent poker news, live reporting from tournaments, exclusive videos, podcasts and such a lot more.
PokerStars is the biggest online poker room offering the most important amount of poker games and different game variations including Texas Hold'em, Omaha and other popular poker games. By joining PokerStars you'll be able to easily learn all of the poker rules and poker strategy by playing free poker games. Join PokerStars and luxuriate in high quality online poker.
Read More... [Source: PokerNews]
No comments:
Post a Comment