

Spencer Bachus, a number one voice in Congress against gaming bills, said the Frank bill would offer "gambling in every home, every computer, Blackberry, iPod." He said states must be making the selections to permit Internet gaming, as opposed to have it forced on them.
"This bill, if it imposes anything, imposes freedom," replied Republican John Campbell of California to the troubles of Bachus. Campbell noted that US residents would have increased choice, not diminished, if the bill were made law.
Bachus continued, saying the effect of the proposal can be redistribution of wealth from poor Americans to foreign gaming operators. He tried to make use of the insurgent grassroots rejection of governmental expansion and the socialistic redistribution of wealth to an ill-fitting reference to online casinos.
But Frank responded testily, calling Bachus' argument nonsense and saying to him that the bill is set "allowing people to voluntarily make decisions of that you disapprove." Frank said US residents have to be free to make their very own choice, without clearance from church groups "or the Christian Science Monitor or whoever."
When a committee member suggested the bill be tied to Jim McDermott's proposal on online gambling revenue or another such bill detailing tax collection, Frank went as far as to notice that, while the revenues make a pleasant addition to the cause, he sees his measure as "a fundamental matter of freedom."
The bill passed a preliminary voice vote, with an official roll call of members to occur later today.
Published on July 28, 2010 by JoshuaMcCarthy

Read More... [Source: Online Casino News RSS XML News Feed]
No comments:
Post a Comment