Despite efforts from the more liberal elements to lump libertarian Rand Paul in with social conservatives, the Kentucky Republican has made clear his is a distinctly different philosophy. His quotes, utilized by the ridiculously biased Huffington Post to supposedly expose him, instead show an understanding of Constitutional concepts foreign to both established conservatives and liberals, and directly relevant to the web gambling debate.Paul is being blasted for being manipulated right into a political firestorm by MSNBC's most strident liberal, Rachel Maddow, who got Paul to mention government has no business creating laws that interfere with private clubs, although the membership is racially exclusive. Paul distinguishes between, as Barney Frank has noted repeatedly regarding online gambling, what government endorses and what government makes illegal.
The tendency to criminalize immoral, unethical, and repulsive behavior is a flaw common between many established Republicans and Democrats alike. Thus, individuals who think online casinos are tawdry and exploitative argue they need to be forbidden to those that disagree.
Rand Paul says that community morals and ethics should discourage improper behavior, and that an far more than law and legislation has ended in the decline of morality in preference to a raising of it, with the letter of the law replacing the spirit of justice. He's in step with that during that he recognizes the overly litigious nature of the U.S. society, wherein any unfortunate occurrence ends up in a lawsuit; if someone spills hot coffee on himself, it's not the coffee brewer's fault, as someone isn't always to blame.
"I think it's a part of this kind of blame game society within the sense that it's usually got to be someone's fault in place of the truth that sometimes accidents happen," Paul says.
Republican social conservatives think that the risk to a minute portion of the general public through online gambling is reason enough to prohibit the playing at Internet casinos altogether. But, because the analogy was made, people die daily in car accidents, yet we do not ban automobiles.
The truth is that life's problems don't have any easy answers, in any other case there could be no problem. Paul argues that, inasmuch as no person has an answer to hard issues without costs, everybody has the appropriate to make their very own choice, whether or not it's to decide to religious fundamentalism and donate their life savings, or enjoy some mild entertainment at an internet gaming site.
Published on May 21, 2010 by JoshuaMcCarthy
Read More... [Source: Religious Gambling News]
No comments:
Post a Comment