John Pappas, executive director of the Poker Players Alliance, appeared last week on MSNBC for a short lived discussion of the bill authored by Barney Frank trying to regulate online poker. Tim Kelly, a professor of psychology who served as executive director of the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, was to be had to talk against the bill.Pappas told the network poker players from bipartisan backgrounds have united behind Frank, because the essential issue concerned about the web gambling debate is set freedom. He said that while Frank would possibly not carry the support of all of the PPA members in other areas, he has become a logo of liberty because of this bill.
Kelly wisecracked that the web poker bill is being brought by "the similar individuals who brought us sub-prime mortgages," relating to the moves by the home Financial Services Committee contributing to the mortgage meltdown. He also advanced the constant misrepresentation by gaming foes that passing 5the bill means opening a casino in every household.
Pappas responded that the ban favored by Kelly and his allies has didn't meet their very own criteria for rejecting online gambling. Pappas offered that "the present law protects not a single child nor a single problem gambler."
When Kelly said revenue claims from licensing online poker sites are effectively taxing the poor, Pappas corrected him, stating that gambling winnings are already officialy taxed, and that any new revenue would come on the excpense of overseas operators who ciurrently pay no US tax.
Kelly also said the U.S. shouldn't be condoning gambling behavior, while Pappas returned to a Frank tenet, that there's a wide difference between government allowing its citizens freedom to select and sanctioning the activity, the world wherein personal liberty falls.
Published on August 7, 2010 by PrestonLewis
Read More... [Source: Gambling Bill News]
No comments:
Post a Comment